Fiorella Isabel, who falsely thinks kids are sold in dinnerware cabinets, is also a 9/11 truther

Matthew Dimitri
2 min readMar 19, 2022

--

(From the March 16, 2022, edition of The Convo Couch)

FIORELLA ISABEL (HOST): Specifically mentioning 9/11, I mean, I’m not gonna go into it on this show right now. But 9/11 was primarily caused by the United States, and the CIA and their actions… it really was something that I would consider a false flag operation.

Now, that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, but that means it was allowed to happen, that there was intelligence involved, that means that weaponized to manufacture consent for war and a lot of people have been talking about that for a long time. And until recently I think it was something taboo, or they didn’t want to say that, or they were called truthers. There’s so many different things you can talk about how the whole thing happened, but for most Americans when they saw it happen before them they bought the whole store because they were emotionally manipulated. And the United States government has done this since the Lusitania.

After Wayfair conspiracy theorist Fiorella Isabel peddled long-debunked 9/11 conspiracy theories about the deadliest terror attack in the country’s history — I recommend reading an AP article titled Video does not show missile hitting the Pentagon on 9/11, before continuing — she alluded to another disproven conspiracy theory promoted by German apologists and the German government that the British civilian ship Lusitania sunk “because military stores being carried by the ship had detonated, bolstering their assertion that the Lusitania was really a munitions-carrying naval ship masquerading as a peaceful civilian ocean liner.”

Scientific American reported on July 31, 1915:

(From the May 7, 2015, edition of Scientific American)

This war-time propaganda worked as a justification for the 1,193 people, including 128 Americans, who died on Lusitania. Only 767 people survived, Scientific American explains:

(From the May 7, 2015, edition of Scientific American)

--

--

No responses yet